Vol. 22, Issue 1, 2023January 24, 2023 CDT
Bigger Isn’t Always Better: Why Small, State-Run MPAS are the Answer to Meeting Conservation Goals Effectively
Bigger Isn’t Always Better: Why Small, State-Run MPAS are the Answer to Meeting Conservation Goals Effectively
MPAsmaritime lawocean conservationenvironmental lawmaritime zonesUNCLOS30-by-30biodiversitysmaller state-run MPAscalifornia
Articles in Vol. 22, Issue 1, 2023
Vol. 22, Issue 1, 2023
- Punitive Damages in Maritime Before and in the Wake of Batterton the Future - A Quixotic Quest for a Legal Unicorn? – Part 2 of 2Arthur A. Crais Jr.
- The Environmental Impact of Industrial Carbon Capture in Louisiana: How Private Landowners can Seek CompensationMaya Acharya
- The Second Cold War: Peaceful Delimitation May Not Survive the Chill of the ArcticAshley F. Bossier
- Sieracki's Revival: Seaman-Status for Pilots Making Waves in the Fifth CircuitNicholas A. Hart
- Bigger Isn't Always Better: Why Small, State-Run MPAS are the Answer to Meeting Conservation Goals EffectivelyJonathan Henneberg
- D.A.R.E. to Cut Back: The Courts Have Expanded United States' Jurisdiction too FarJackson Scott
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon Case NoteLydia Weaver
Jonathan Henneberg, Bigger Isn’t Always Better: Why Small, State-Run MPAS Are the Answer to Meeting Conservation Goals Effectively, 22 Loy. Mar. L. J. 102 (2023).